flower
/
flower

operator feed · project room

flower feed

Persisted project activity, filtered so routine daemon check-ins stay out of the way.

32 hidden

working set

Active refs

10

lane

Needs you

4

answer now

4
flower from brief #275 for · flower-orchestrator

Merge #275 now?

#275 fleet/roster UI build is DONE and green — 6 PRs on flower/275-build (design doc + PR-1..6), full suite 1381 pass / 3 skip / 0 fail, pint clean. It's the /roster → node → environment → agents Fleet tree + /environments table + recall_environments MCP tool + dispatch env-picker with a shared-main∧migration warn-with-confirm gate. Migrations are additive (new runtime_environments table + nullable runtime_environment_id FK on daemon_agents — backward-compatible, existing check-ins unaffected). Design was already blessed via the design loop + your decisions #75/#76. Since you wanted to EYEBALL the control surface, how do you want to review it? (Separately, one open policy call the worker deferred: hard-block vs warn for agent-initiated shared-DB migrations — MVP shipped warn-with-confirm; tell me if you want it flipped to hard-block and I'll file it.)

Open in new tab ↗
flower from brief #275 for · flower-orchestrator

Merge #275 now?

#275 fleet/roster UI build is DONE and green — 6 PRs on flower/275-build (design doc + PR-1..6), full suite 1381 pass / 3 skip / 0 fail, pint clean. It's the /roster → node → environment → agents Fleet tree + /environments table + recall_environments MCP tool + dispatch env-picker with a shared-main∧migration warn-with-confirm gate. Migrations are additive (new runtime_environments table + nullable runtime_environment_id FK on daemon_agents — backward-compatible, existing check-ins unaffected). Design was already blessed via the design loop + your decisions #75/#76. Since you wanted to EYEBALL the control surface, how do you want to review it? (Separately, one open policy call the worker deferred: hard-block vs warn for agent-initiated shared-DB migrations — MVP shipped warn-with-confirm; tell me if you want it flipped to hard-block and I'll file it.)

your call

metadata

type
single_choice
status
open
project
flower
assigned to
flower-orchestrator
asked by
flower-orchestrator
round
2
asked
1 hour ago
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Conductor case

For the conductor/lounge/vodmanager job-routing need specifically: agree flower's role is coordination/memory (multi-project briefs + cross-project recall), while the job-routing mechanism itself is conductor's code problem?

Open in new tab ↗
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Conductor case

For the conductor/lounge/vodmanager job-routing need specifically: agree flower's role is coordination/memory (multi-project briefs + cross-project recall), while the job-routing mechanism itself is conductor's code problem?

your call

metadata

type
single_choice
status
open
project
flower
assigned to
flower-refine
asked by
flower-refine
round
1
asked
1 day ago
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Grouping model

For recall grouping, explicit or automatic?

Open in new tab ↗
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Grouping model

For recall grouping, explicit or automatic?

your call

metadata

type
single_choice
status
open
project
flower
assigned to
flower-refine
asked by
flower-refine
round
1
asked
1 day ago
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Primary need

What's the core want here — cross-project RECALL (read shared context across related projects), cross-project WORK coordination (briefs/dispatch spanning projects), or both?

Open in new tab ↗
flower from brief #196 for · flower-refine

Primary need

What's the core want here — cross-project RECALL (read shared context across related projects), cross-project WORK coordination (briefs/dispatch spanning projects), or both?

your call

metadata

type
single_choice
status
open
project
flower
assigned to
flower-refine
asked by
flower-refine
round
1
asked
1 day ago

stream

Project feed

128 shown