Follow daemon spawn packet configuration

next steps

—

key decisions

• Used a poke timer (1681) to wake predecessor 41 when the handoff was delayed (per known protocol gap #143).
• Refreshed the stale orchestrator-pid KV to daemon 47/proc 1186 based on fresh roster data.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• fb#145 verified fixed on master, watch downgraded to awaiting close
• fb#139 verified per-project baton landed, watch closed

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• User requested a brief to fix the gap and repair stranded records.

key decisions

• Decided not to use signal completion as auto-close trigger because signal-done does not guarantee fix shipped (e.g., #99 signal done but FLOWER-1X unfixed).
• Decided to keep strandeds as tracking gap, not alarm noise, since 'planned' is separate from 'open'.

open questions

—

next steps

• Orchestrator dispatches brief #276 into a worktree
• Verify on completion: route-promote auto-address works, #145/#137/#104 repaired if shipped, #99 NOT force-closed

key decisions

• Do NOT use route_feedback signal done as auto-close trigger (signal done=dispatch-accept, not merge; proven by fb#99 signal done but unfixed)
• Forward fix: every route-promoted feedback must end up with a brief carrying feedback_id so existing auto-close fires on real completion
• Backfill: per-item shipped-verification reconcile (--dry-run default); #99 must stay open as negative test

open questions

• Orchestrator has not yet dispatched brief #276 – what is the expected cadence?
• Are fb#137 and fb#104 already shipped and safe to close?

next steps

—

key decisions

• FLOWER-1Y is a transient connection-refused blip, not actionable now
• Brief #276 and signals #277/#278 are within normal dispatch latency waiting for orchestrator's next heartbeat
• Ingest-stuck warning is chronically oscillating and benign, monitored only
• No new feedback arrivals (max id unchanged at 145)

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• Operator to flag brief #276 for auto-dispatch in /briefs or call brief_dispatch(276).
• Ops to verify after dispatch that route-promote auto-address works and stranded records are repaired.

key decisions

• Do not directly dispatch #276 because ops tools lack dispatch capability; report to operator instead.
• Store a watch entry to track the blocker and verify outcome after dispatch.

open questions

• Exact mechanism operator will use to trigger dispatch of brief #276.

next steps

• Continue routine triage cycles; monitor watches per charter.
• When operator dispatches #276, verify route-promote auto-address and repair of stranded records.

key decisions

• Do not re-ping operator about #276 on every cycle since it was already reported and is operator-owned.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Heartbeat checks follow the established routine without modification.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Do not re-ping #276 — dispatch trigger is operator-owned
• Monitor ingest-stuck trend but no action unless 3x/+100 jump or continued rise

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Relaxed trend-watch on ingest-stuck from 7 to 6 un-indexed sessions, treating it as benign oscillation rather than a climb.
• Maintained current watches without re-ping on #276.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• ingest-stuck drift from 6 to 5 is benign oscillation, no intervention needed.
• #276 remains operator-owned trigger dispatch; no re-ping issued.
• No Sentry or feedback items required routing this cycle.

open questions

• Does the transient FLOWER-1Y connection error warrant deeper investigation?
• Is the chunk embedding backlog of 392 within normal bounds?

next steps

—

key decisions

• No decisions were needed; routine check passed cleanly.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• FLOWER-1Y is a transient blip, no action needed.
• Brief #276 remains operator-owned trigger, no re-ping.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• No re-ping for #276; still planned/undispatched.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• No action routed because all metrics were stable or within expected ranges
• Digest appended to scratchpad 1005 for audit trail

open questions

• Brief #276 remains planned with no dispatch request; operator needs to decide whether to create a dispatch or reconsider the brief.

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• No re-ping on brief #276 (operator-owned, unchanged).
• Ignore FLOWER-1Y as a transient blip (will age out of the 24-hour window).
• No route or ping needed for this cycle (quiet).

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Heartbeat cycles are non-actionable — daemon is healthy and has no pending work.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Decision to append a concise one-line digest because all indicators remained stable and no action was required.
• No re-ping on #276 since it remains operator-owned and unchanged.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• No new decisions; all watches unchanged.

open questions

—

next steps

• Orchestrator to drain auto_dispatch signal and dispatch brief #276 into a clean worktree.
• Ops to verify on completion that route-promoted feedback auto-addresses and stranded records are repaired.
• Monitor for completion signal to validate fix for feedback auto-close discrepancy.

key decisions

• Updated orchestrator PID KV to daemon 53 (process 1194) based on signal 174 targeting it.
• Marked watch #15 as unblocked with state BRIEF_276_AUTO_DISPATCH_QUEUED, resolving the previously reported blocker.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Signal 174 pending ~10 min is normal latency given slow orch cadence; re-evaluate next cycle if still pending.
• Roster clean: old orch 47 retired, fleet stable (orch 53, ops 52, refine 42).

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Signals targeting orchestrator and refine daemons were not acted upon by ops as they are baton-gated.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Used urgent direct nudge (solo timer to proc) instead of queued command to avoid piling onto undrained queue.
• Did not attempt to drain from ops because baton is gated to orchestrator.
• Diagnosis prioritized baton check (setting 15) over prior false alarm pattern.

open questions

• What caused the orch drain loop to stall? No root cause identified; timer may have died or loop blocked.

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• Monitor whether orchestrator claims signal 180 for #146 within one heartbeat
• Continue watch on orch-drain-health for recurrence of previous stall

key decisions

• #147 reported only (not routed) because merge was already complete on master
• #146 routed as mcp_issue with fix direction to accept project_id alias and/or fail loud on unscoped creation
• Fix-spec enriched with root cause analysis from code inspection

open questions

• Was the orchestrator's non-execution of the merge on first wake a latent bug that self-healed, or did something else complete #278?
• Will orchestrator drain latency remain healthy given previous stall pattern?

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• Investigate why #276 not merged and orchestrator drain stalled.

key decisions

• Decided to escalate orchestrator unreliability to operator.

open questions

• Is the orchestrator's loop fundamentally broken?

next steps

• Verify that the backfill command (part of #276) actually addresses stranded feedback records.

key decisions

• Nudging is a band-aid; durable fix requires orchestrator reset/restart.

open questions

• Will the orchestrator stall recur without a reset?

next steps

—

key decisions

• Used evidence-gated reconcile command requiring Feedback:#<id> commit trailer.
• Only addresses planned/triaged feedback with shipped evidence, never closes unshipped items.
• Dry-run by default for safety; --apply required to write changes.

open questions

—

next steps

• Monitor signal 182 (#275 build-auto-dispatch) for completion and drain health.

key decisions

• Feedback #148 is an idea type, left as operator-gated for human review (not routed).

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• Confirm orchestrator daemon 54 is fully live at next triage
• Monitor FLOWER-1Y to determine if it is transient or recurring
• Continue watching routed items: #275 build merge, #278 confirm, fb#146 fix dispatch

key decisions

• Orchestrator self-reset is healthy and does not require manual operator intervention
• Reset note indicates successor will handle #275, #278, and fb#146 — leave to orchestrator machinery

open questions

• Is FLOWER-1Y a transient connection blip or does it indicate a persistent MySQL connectivity issue?

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

• Orchestrator reset 53→54 confirmed clean: daemon 53 retired, daemon 54 live at 15% context.

open questions

—

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• Monitor #146 dispatch (orch 54) on next cycle
• Continue watching FLOWER-1Y, ingest-stuck, open feedback

key decisions

• No route-worthy bugs found; FLOWER-1Y considered a transient blip, not actionable
• #146 not stalled but awaiting route_feedback dispatch on fresh orchestrator cadence

open questions

• Why is FLOWER-1Y only a single event 16h ago? Should it be resolved as transient?
• What is the root cause of failed_jobs=1? Needs investigation.

next steps

—

key decisions

—

open questions

—

next steps

• 执行完整的 triage 周期，包括 Sentry 检查、健康检查、反馈 delta 处理、决策处理、基于 kv ledger 的去重、路由已确认的 bug 并追加 triage-log 摘要
• 确认开放监视项的状态（FLOWER-1X/#99, #104, #113, ingest-chronic, #139, #145）

key decisions

—

open questions

• triage 周期是否由后续会话完成？
• 开放监视项（如 #99, #104, #113 等）是否已被解决或更新？