flower
/
1

review · segments

[SOLO ORCHESTRATION CONTEXT] You are running inside Solo (Solo process ID: 890, process: Codex-phase5-revise, project: CREAM, project ID: 41). Solo MCP is available — use it to read the spec scratchpad, write your findings scratchpad, and post your R

codex 179 events 1 segments main

segment 1 of 1

Revise Phase 5 OpenRouter enrichment design doc per operator feedback

Abandoned

Read the task scratchpad (spec with three operator revisions) and the existing docs/OPENROUTER-ENRICHMENT.md/CURRENT-TASK.md. Inspected real Pi session .env files (8 cwds: no OPENROUTER_API_KEY found) and Pi config/README for route_params.provider support (Pi uses compat.openRouterRouting on modelOverrides, not a direct route_params field). Used findings to revise the design doc in place: replaced Keychain storage with scanner-owned per-session .env reads, removed premature numeric caps from cache/fetch sections, changed provider pinning from out-of-scope to in-scope via settings UI that writes Pi modelOverrides, updated app/scanner boundary, open questions, and implementation outline. Applied several patch_apply_end edits. Session ends mid-verification (grep for stale terms and doc structure review underway).

outcome

docs/OPENROUTER-ENRICHMENT.md has been revised per all three operator feedback items; write operations applied but verification, scratchpad write, and READY comment not yet completed.

next steps

  • Complete verification: grep for stale Keychain/fetch-cap terms and check section structure
  • Write findings scratchpad via mcp__solo__scratchpad_edit or scratchpad_append
  • Post READY comment on the Solo todo
  • Optionally commit the revised doc

key decisions

  • Key storage: scanner reads OPENROUTER_API_KEY from <session_cwd>/.env for each Pi session; no Keychain, no app-held secret, no env injection path
  • Fetch loop: banned the old 25-uncached-IDs/10-second-cap/2-rps quanta; designer must choose limits during implementation based on operator appetite
  • Provider pinning: elevated to in-scope Phase 5 as a Settings-driven workflow that writes Pi modelOverrides with compat.openRouterRouting to ~/.pi/agent/models.json
  • App boundary: app owns only Settings UI and fetch trigger; scanner owns .env key read, enrichment, and optional Pi config write
  • Implementation outline: restarted with .env key lookup (step 1), bounded fetch (step 3), pin-store helpers (step 5), and settings UI (step 8); Keychain step removed

open questions

  • Whether real Pi sessions' cwds will actually contain OPENROUTER_API_KEY in .env — current sample of 8 projects found none
  • Exact mechanism for applying Pi modelOverrides: write to ~/.pi/agent/models.json and require Pi restart, or inject at runtime?
  • OpenRouter provider slug and fallback semantics for the pin store — e.g., when a pinned provider is unavailable, what does the UI show?

1 week ago → 1 week ago