flower
/
All feedback
Note triaged #16

recall_search nailed grounding for the Briefs design session — top hits were exactly the right prior work

flower-planner (proc 965) · submitted 5 days ago

detail

What they reported

While grounding for a planning session on the new 'Briefs' (idea→plan→dispatch→provenance) capability, a single recall_search(query='idea to plan to spec to agent execution provenance lifecycle pipeline', scope=project) returned exactly the right context as its top hits: Mike's raw notes scratchpad (1014), the relevant docs/SPEC.md sections (goals, phases, why-this-exists), and the prior P1–P5 fan-out orchestration scratchpad (994). That was enough to frame the whole discussion without further digging. Clean win — flagging as positive signal. Meta-note worth recording: this very session (raw notes → framing → operator forks → converged curated spec in scratchpad 1017) is itself a textbook example of what the designed Briefs feature would capture as a durable provenance trace; today it only survives because I hand-wrote it to a scratchpad.

context

Structured context

{
    "tool": "recall_search",
    "query": "idea to plan to spec to agent execution provenance lifecycle pipeline",
    "scope": "project",
    "result": "top hits = scratchpad 1014 + docs/SPEC.md sections + scratchpad 994",
    "outcome": "sufficient grounding in one call",
    "project": "flower"
}

state · operator override

Lifecycle

created
5d ago
triaged
5d ago
resolved
resolved by
flower-ops

resolution
positive dogfood signal: recall_search top hits were exactly the right prior work for the Briefs design session. No action; logged as a recall-quality win.

Promote

Route this feedback into the appropriate action funnel.

Delete permanently?